Inquiry learning activities
implement a social constructivist approach that enables students to interact
with the information they discover. Students are strongly encouraged to ask
questions to help build their understanding and comprehension and in so doing
construct their own concepts and knowledge. The questioning approach, so fundamental
to inquiry learning, is used throughout the inquiry process thus enabling students
to progress from simple fact finding to the application of new found knowledge
in new and unrelated circumstances (Kuhlthau, Maniotes, & Caspari, 2007).
The most important educational
implication of constructivist learning is that it is student centred. According to the constructivist view point
knowledge is a creation of the mind and is constructed as we network with our
surroundings. It is an active process of selecting and interpreting information
and is influenced by our own unique, existing schemata as well as by our
interests and motivations. The ultimate aim of all guided inquiry learning is to develop the initiative, confidence and problem solving skills required for open inquiry. Students need to develop this skill over time and this is where guided or structured inquiry tasks come in. Slowly, as students are scaffolded and facilitated through increasingly less structured tasks they develop the skills and mental stamina needed to accomplish these tasks.It is vital; therefore, that learning is student
centred and active (Kuhlthau, Maniotes, & Caspari, 2007; Coffman, 2009).
Inquiry learning can be viewed on a
continuum ranging from confirmation inquiry that is highly teacher directed, to
open inquiry that is entirely student led. The ILA that I witnessed would be
placed at the midpoint of that continuum as it is Guided Inquiry with
sufficient teacher scaffolding as required by young adolescents. (Bell, Smetana
and Binns, 2005)
The role of the teacher in guided inquiry
learning includes:-
·
Encouraging curiosity: During the ILA the teacher accomplished this
by beginning the task with an online survey that enabled students to discover
how many planets it would require for humanity to survive if everyone lived
they way they do. This served to pique student interest about their ecological
footprint.
·
Engaging extrinsic and intrinsic
motivation: students are more inclined
to pursue something if it interests them personally. The teacher engaged
students’ intrinsic motivation by asking them to identify one ‘footprint
factor’ that was of interest to them in order to focus their inquiry research
on that particular topic. Intrinsic motivation was further encouraged by making
some of the goals personal, for instance “strategies that you, your family or local community could take to reduce your footprint”. One of the ways that extrinsic motivation was accomplished was
to display excellent examples of past students work, this encouraged students
to have a goal to work towards.
·
Facilitating:
this teacher guided the learning process by asking questions, commenting
and relating new and unfamiliar experiences with established ones.
·
Creating a learning environment: the teacher creates an environment in which
the students can have the kinds of experiences they need to have in order to
learn. The ILA was designed to lead the learner through a number of excellent
learning experiences and not just to “teach” students about their environmental
impact.
·
Diagnosing problems: creating situations which will confront
misconceptions held by the student to help them to reorganise their schema.
This is often accomplished by using the “Zone of Proximal development” as
discussed by Vygotsky 1978 in Kuhlthau, 2007. Using this technique students are
able to master tasks that are almost out of their reach with the assistance of
someone who is very familiar with the process. One way I was able to assist a
student with this was by explaining and illustrating the meanings and
implications behind primary and secondary research.
·
Modelling information literacy skills: Students needed to use a number of
information literacy; many of these skills were “taught” by an instructional
team. Skills such as observing, collecting, analysing, synthesising, search
strategies and technology strategies assisted students to make predictions and
draw conclusion.
References
Bell, R., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction. The Science Teacher, 72 (7), 30-33
Coffman, T. (2009). Engaging Students through Inquiry Learning and Technology. Lanham, Maryland. The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc.
Kuhlthau, C., Maniotes, L., & Caspari, A. (2007). Guided Inquiry: Learning in the 21st Century. Westport, Connecticut, Libraries Unlimited
References
Bell, R., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction. The Science Teacher, 72 (7), 30-33
Coffman, T. (2009). Engaging Students through Inquiry Learning and Technology. Lanham, Maryland. The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc.
Kuhlthau, C., Maniotes, L., & Caspari, A. (2007). Guided Inquiry: Learning in the 21st Century. Westport, Connecticut, Libraries Unlimited
No comments:
Post a Comment